This AI fund sends investors payouts every Thursday 
A Star Investor Just Trimmed Amazon—Here's What It meansWritten by Sam Quirke on August 18, 2026 
Key Points
- Dan Loeb's Third Point trimmed its Amazon stake by roughly 10%, but the fund still holds it as a top position, suggesting routine rebalancing rather than a loss of confidence.
- Other major hedge funds, including Baupost, Coatue Management, and Appaloosa, increased their Amazon holdings during the same period, indicating broad institutional confidence in the stock.
- Amazon shares fell nearly 10% from highs mainly because of concerns over $220 billion in planned spending, negative free cash flow, and profit reliance on its Anthropic stake gain.
- Special Report: Former Merrill Lynch Advisor Reveals His Weekly Options Approach
Few things unsettle investors quite like the sight of a famous name heading for the exit. So when news broke last week that investor Dan Loeb's Third Point fund had trimmed its stake in Amazon.com Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN), just as the shares slid back from record highs, it was tempting to read it as a red flag. If one of the sharpest investors around is selling, then perhaps ordinary shareholders should worry too? However, the reality is more nuanced, and a closer look at the move tells a very different story. Far from a dramatic vote of no confidence, Third Point's decision looks like routine portfolio housekeeping, and the wider picture actually paints Amazon in a reassuring light. The real story, it turns out, has very little to do with Dan Loeb and Third Point at all.
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from collapsing — and billionaire Sam Altman is now an investor.
This under-the-radar firm is drawing serious attention from those watching the energy infrastructure space closely. Click here to learn this company's name for free today
A Trim, Not a RetreatThe first thing to note is the scale of the move, or rather the lack of it. Third Point only reduced its Amazon holding by roughly 10%, hardly the kind of wholesale dumping that would signal a loss of faith. Even after the sale, Amazon remains one of the fund's largest disclosed positions and, by some measures, its highest-quality holding in the lot. That context matters. This wasn’t so much a manager throwing in the towel on a soured investment as an investor reducing one position among many, most likely to free up cash for other trades. Indeed, Third Point was buying elsewhere during the same period, making this look like textbook behavior of a fund rebalancing its book. Seen in that light, reading too deeply into Third Point’s sale would be a mistake. What the Funds Are DoingIf Third Point's move still leaves a nagging doubt, its peers' behavior should help settle it. One prominent fund was trimming, while several others were doing the opposite, adding to their Amazon stakes with enthusiasm. The list of buyers is a roll-call of respected names. Seth Klarman's Baupost fund increased its holding, as did the tech-focused Coatue Management, which boosted its position by almost half. David Tepper's Appaloosa added to its stake too, painting a picture of broad institutional appetite rather than retreat. This is the crucial point. Not only is the smart money failing to flee Amazon, but it's also actually mostly moving in the other direction, with more big names buying, and buying aggressively, than heading for the door. If anything, institutional conviction is tilting bullish.
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying out up to $1,152 a month to regular investors - no mining stocks, no options, no physical metal required.
Chief Income Strategist Tim Plaehn calls it a breakthrough strategy that transforms gold's rally into reliable monthly payouts. The next distribution is just days away. Discover the gold income fund before the next payout date
The Real Reason Shares Have SlippedIf the hedge fund trim is a red herring, what actually explains Amazon's near-10% slide from its highs? The answer lies in its recent earnings, released at the end of July, and specifically in a growing debate about the eye-watering sums it's spending. On the face of it, Amazon’s results were strong, with the all-important cloud division growing rapidly and its profitability improving. The concern is what that growth is costing. Amazon has dramatically raised its spending plans for the year to a colossal $220 billion, a level of investment so vast it's pushed the company's free cash flow into negative territory, unnerving investors who worry the returns may not justify the outlay. It didn’t help that a large chunk of Amazon's reported profit came not from its core operations but from a one-off paper gain tied to the rising value of its stake in the AI company Anthropic. The recent slide could be due to investors getting spooked at how dependent July’s profit print was on that windfall. Look Past the HeadlineStill, the picture is far less alarming than a headline about a star investor selling, or the stock selling off over the past fortnight, might suggest. The trimmed position itself is a footnote, a modest rebalancing swamped by the buying of other major funds, not the smoke signal of trouble some might fear. The real story is the more familiar tension now surrounding Amazon. On one side sit the bulls, who see the enormous spending as the price of cementing Amazon's lead in cloud computing and AI, an investment that will pay off handsomely in time. On the other side, the skeptics worry that the returns on all that capital remain mostly unproven and that the shares have run too far, too fast. It makes for a real debate, and one that will define the stock far more than any hedge fund's regulatory filing. For now, that means watching Amazon's spending, rather than its shareholder list, is what will tell investors where the shares go next. Read this article online › Featured Articles
Did you enjoy this article?  
|
