First a Message from our Friends at Immersed [ad] |
Have you heard about this sub $1 company that is making people "Superhumans"? |
It's all thanks to their new product called Visor. |
|
And it's very similar to Jarvis from the movie Iron Man. |
Investors are calling this a 'massive breakthrough'. |
But not for the reason you think... |
Investors have already started flooding in to take advantage of this while the company is still private. |
>>> Click here to see the sub $1 'Superhuman' AI Stock |
|
FEATURED ARTICLE |
Microsoft Ahead of Earnings: Bull Case vs. Bear Case |
Microsoft heads into earnings on Wednesday, January 28, 2026 (after the close) with a very "classic Microsoft" setup: |
The business is still compounding. The AI narrative is real (Azure + Copilot + developer tools). But the market is asking a sharper question now: How much are we paying for that growth, and does the margin math still work?
|
Here's the bull case, bear case, and the valuation reality check—with the specific numbers investors are likely to anchor on. |
|
What the market expects on Jan 28 |
Microsoft confirmed it will report FY26 Q2 results after market close Jan. 28 and host the call at 2:30pm PT. |
Consensus expectations going into the print (as widely circulated in earnings previews): |
Revenue: about $80.28B EPS: about $3.86
|
The "center of gravity" for the stock won't be Windows or Office. It'll be: |
|
Barron's notes the Street is modeling Azure growth ~37%, a deceleration from the prior quarter's 40% pace—so the bar is "good, not perfect." |
|
Quick refresher: what just happened last quarter (the baseline) |
In FY26 Q1 Microsoft reported: |
Revenue: $77.67B (about +18% YoY) Azure and other cloud services revenue: +40% Microsoft Cloud gross margin: 68%, and it declined as AI infrastructure scaled Capex: $34.9B (with roughly half in shorter-lived assets like GPUs/CPUs) Returned to shareholders: $10.7B (dividends + repurchases)
|
That's the trade-off in one snapshot: growth is strong, demand is strong, spending is also strong. |
|
The bull case |
1) Azure stays "too strong to ignore" |
If Azure prints closer to the prior 40% pace (or beats the implied ~37% expectation), the narrative snaps back to: Microsoft is the cleanest AI monetization story in megacap. |
Two reasons this matters: |
|
2) AI demand is not theoretical—it's showing up in real spend |
Microsoft's own commentary last quarter tied capex directly to "growing demand for cloud and AI offerings," and noted that a large chunk of spend is going into GPUs/CPUs to support Azure platform demand and first-party AI solutions. |
If management indicates: |
supply constraints easing, strong backlog/commitments, and sustained demand for AI workloads, …then investors tend to pay up for visibility.
|
3) Copilot becomes less "cool demo" and more "revenue line" |
The Street is still debating how quickly Copilot turns into durable, high-margin revenue (vs. being bundled/discounted to drive adoption). Any commentary that suggests: |
improving attach rates, expanding seat deployments, or stronger consumption tied to Copilot features, …can lift sentiment quickly.
|
Also notable: Microsoft's internal embrace of developer AI tools keeps expanding (including experimentation beyond OpenAI-only workflows), which supports the "AI-first productivity stack" thesis. |
4) The multiple can re-expand if guidance is clean |
Trefis points out that a meaningful portion of recent MSFT stock moves has been driven by multiple compression, not collapsing fundamentals. If Microsoft prints a clean quarter and guides confidently, you can get a "multiple relief rally." |
|
The bear case |
1) Cloud margins are the tripwire |
Microsoft already told you the issue: Cloud gross margin fell to 68% as AI infrastructure scaled. |
If the print shows: |
continued margin compression, higher-than-expected AI serving costs, or slower efficiency gains, …the market will worry that AI is becoming a capex-heavy, margin-dilutive arms race, at least in the near term.
|
2) Capex sticker shock (again) |
Microsoft's $34.9B quarterly capex number is enormous, and Reuters highlighted that spending has been outpacing expectations and that Microsoft signaled spend would rise—reversing earlier expectations of moderation. |
If management reiterates aggressive spend without equally strong monetization signals, investors may keep discounting the stock on "ROI uncertainty." |
Zooming out: the market is increasingly sensitive to the entire mega-cap AI spending cycle (including debt issuance to fund infrastructure), which can pressure sentiment even when earnings are fine. |
3) Azure deceleration (even if still "great") can be treated as a miss |
This is the funny part of AI expectations: 37% growth is incredible, but if the market wants 40% and you print 36% with cautious commentary, it can trade like something broke. |
Barron's notes some firms are cutting price targets even while staying positive—because valuation sensitivity in software has risen. |
4) Competitive & regulatory noise doesn't disappear |
Cloud is a knife fight (AWS, Google), and AI model/platform competition is intensifying. Any hint that pricing is tightening or enterprise cycles are lengthening can hit the multiple. |
|
Valuation: is Microsoft "cheap" here? |
Let's be blunt: Microsoft is rarely "cheap" in the traditional value sense. |
Current price: about $465.95 Trailing P/E: about 36.7x Forward P/E (widely cited): about ~28.0x |
Compared to mega-cap peers (trailing P/E snapshot) |
Apple: ~30.3x Alphabet: ~23.6x Microsoft: ~36.7x
|
So… not "cheap vs peers" on trailing earnings. |
When can you call it "cheap" anyway? |
Microsoft looks "cheap" when you believe one (or more) of these is true: |
The market is underestimating Azure durability (AI workloads keep demand elevated). The market is over-penalizing near-term margins, ignoring operating leverage as capex normalizes. The multiple is closer to the low end of its own range for an AI-led upcycle (some bullish analysts argue the stock still doesn't fully reflect the long-term growth path).
|
|
Dividend and capital return: nice, but not the core thesis |
Microsoft pays $0.91 per share quarterly. That's $3.64 annually, which at ~$465.95 is about a 0.78% yield. |
Translation: the dividend is a signal of quality and shareholder friendliness, but you're not buying MSFT for income—you're buying for compounding + AI optionality. |
(And Microsoft is returning meaningful total capital via buybacks + dividends—$10.7B last quarter alone.) |
|
What could happen in the next year (realistic upside paths) |
1) AI monetization gets clearer |
If Copilot moves from "interesting" to "standard line item" across enterprise budgets, you can see: |
higher per-user economics, increased retention / stickiness, and incremental cloud consumption.
|
2) Azure stays structurally strong even as growth moderates |
Azure doesn't need to stay at 40% forever. If it stabilizes in the high 20s / low 30s with improving margins, the stock can still work—especially if the market stops fearing a cliff. |
3) Margin leverage returns as capex growth rate slows |
If Microsoft can show that: |
the worst margin pressure is behind it, AI unit economics improve, and efficiency gains offset infrastructure costs, …then the market can re-rate the stock upward even without explosive top-line surprise.
|
|
What probably won't happen (but investors keep hoping for) |
A clean, immediate "capex drops + margins expand" flip. Infrastructure cycles take time, and Microsoft itself is signaling spend is tied to demand. A year with no volatility. Microsoft is now priced as an AI bellwether; it will trade with AI sentiment.
|
|
The checklist for earnings night |
If you only watch four things: |
Azure growth (and commentary vs supply constraints) Cloud margin trend (does it stabilize from 68%?) Capex direction (scale, pace, and ROI language) Guidance tone (confidence vs caution)
|
|
Bottom line |
Microsoft into Jan. 28 is a quality compounder priced like a premium AI platform. |
Bull case: Azure resilience + AI monetization clarity + guidance confidence = multiple support (or expansion). Bear case: margins + capex stay "too heavy," Azure decelerates, and the stock keeps getting valued more like a mature software giant than an AI winner.
|
Is it "cheap"? Not on headline multiples. But it can be "cheap" relative to its own long-term cash flow power if the market is overly focused on near-term infrastructure costs and underweighting how sticky Microsoft's AI distribution is (Windows + 365 + GitHub + Azure). |
Disclaimer: This content is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Investing in stocks involves risk, including the potential loss of principal. Always do your own research or consult a qualified financial professional before making investment decisions. |
|
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment