| Now let's look at the other side of the ledger. The federal government spent roughly $2 trillion more than it took in last year. Add in unfunded promises like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, and you're looking at a debt time bomb ticking away under the foundation of our economy. Unlike billionaires, the government doesn't produce goods or services that people voluntarily pay for. It taxes citizens and redistributes money through a bureaucratic process that's wasteful, inefficient, and riddled with political favoritism. Need proof? Here are a few trillion-dollar failures: - The Afghanistan War: Over $2.3 trillion spent in two decades, ending in a chaotic withdrawal with little to show for it.
- COVID-19 Relief Fraud: The Department of Justice estimates over $100 billion was stolen or misused. Some watchdogs believe the figure is much higher.
- Medicare and Medicaid Waste: These programs lose an estimated $100 billion a year to fraud, abuse, and administrative error.
- Interest Payments: This fiscal year, the U.S. will spend over $1 trillion annually just on interest - more than it spends on defense.
And unlike billionaires, government agencies don't get punished for losing money. There's no bankruptcy court for the Department of Transportation or Department of Education. They simply ask Congress for more funding. And politicians happily oblige - because they're spending your money, not theirs. Billionaires are builders. Trillionaires are redistributors. Billionaires risk their capital to solve problems, create products, and build companies. If they fail, they lose their own money. That's called skin in the game. Trillionaires don't bear the cost of failure. Bureaucrats still get paid. Congress still gets reelected. And when things go wrong - as they often do - the taxpayer foots the bill. Take Elon Musk. He built a rocket company that now launches more satellites than any nation on earth. He made electric vehicles viable when Detroit couldn't. He bought Twitter to reform what he saw as a censorship problem (whether you agree or not, he put his money where his mouth is). Now compare that with the federal government's track record on innovation. Remember the $400 hammer from the Pentagon? The $2 billion Obamacare website that didn't work on launch day? The countless agencies and departments that overlap, duplicate efforts, and produce bloated reports no one reads? If the federal government were a business, it would've gone bankrupt decades ago. One common complaint is that billionaires drive inequality. But that argument misses the point. The question isn't how much someone else has. The question is whether your own standard of living is improving. Thanks to billionaire-backed technology, you now carry a supercomputer in your pocket. You can get medicine delivered to your door, hail a ride in minutes, and work remotely from anywhere. These were luxuries or fantasies just 20 years ago. Billionaires made them real. What really threatens the middle class isn't billionaires getting richer... It's Washington's trillionaires, driving up inflation, weakening the dollar, and piling debt onto the next generation. Let's also talk about transparency. Public companies must file earnings reports, disclose risks, and answer to shareholders. Their executives can be fired. Their stock can plummet. Meanwhile, the government operates in the shadows. The Pentagon routinely fails audits. Congress passes 2,000-page spending bills that no one reads. And when a scandal breaks, it disappears from the news cycle within days. You may not like what a billionaire does with his money. But at least it's his or her money. There's also a structural flaw in trillionaire governance: political incentives. Politicians get reelected by promising more spending, more benefits, and more programs. They rarely win elections by preaching fiscal discipline or budget cuts. That's why entitlements keep growing, and deficits keep widening. Contrast that with billionaires, who must earn every dollar in the marketplace. Yet billionaires get scapegoated while trillion-dollar deficits receive a shrug. How about helping the needy? Billionaires don't just give away their money. They give it with purpose. The Gates Foundation has spent over $50 billion on global health, education, and clean water. Michael Bloomberg has funded anti-smoking campaigns that saved millions of lives. Mark Zuckerberg has pledged 99% of his Facebook shares to support criminal justice reform, invest in open-access research, and cure, prevent, or manage all diseases by the end of this century. Compare this with federal charity: slow, impersonal, and riddled with inefficiency. Federal aid comes with bureaucracy attached. It creates dependency instead of empowerment. Private giving is faster, more flexible, and more effective. So who's the real threat? The billionaire who builds electric cars, revolutionizes space travel, or funds global health research? Or the trillionaires in Congress who spend without restraint, borrow without a plan, and leave taxpayers holding the bag? Billionaires don't always get it right. Some are egotistical. Others are politically polarizing. You don't have to agree with everything they do - but you benefit from much of what they've built. Trillionaire spending in Washington, by comparison, creates dependency, debt, and dysfunction. It erodes prosperity instead of building it. And it does so under the illusion of public service. You don't have to love billionaires. But you should fear trillionaires. Because while billionaires spend their money, trillionaires spend yours. Good investing, Alex P.S. I'd love to hear your thoughts on this topic. Click here - or on the button below - to join the conversation. | 
No comments:
Post a Comment