Wednesday, May 28, 2025

Statement by Chief Pentagon Spokesperson and Senior Advisor, Sean Parnell, on Permanent Change of Station Targeted Reductions Review and Personnel Policy Changes

Left
Release
View Online
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Statement by Chief Pentagon Spokesperson and Senior Advisor, Sean Parnell, on Permanent Change of Station Targeted Reductions Review and Personnel Policy Changes
May 28, 2025

The Department recently directed the Military Departments to consider ways to reduce the frequency of permanent change of station (PCS) moves while continuing to accomplish the mission.

Though PCS moves play an important role in developing military and civilian personnel and meeting mission requirements, they cost the Department $5 billion annually and have numerous impacts on military families. The Military Departments have 120 days to develop proposals to gradually reduce discretionary move budgets and reduce overall PCS frequency for military and civilian personnel.  They will also reexamine their career development models for commissioned and noncommissioned officers to promote geographic stability.

Through this careful examination, the Department will identify ways to balance mission with efficiency and military family needs. This initiative focuses on reducing the costs of PCS and is distinct from the Secretary's direction to establish the PCS Task Force, which is focused on the timely and efficient execution of PCS moves.

The link to memo can be found here.

The link to the fact sheet can be found here.

Right

Press Advisories   Releases   Transcripts

Speeches   Publications   Contracts

 

ABOUT   NEWS   HELP CENTER   PRESS PRODUCTS
Facebook  X   Instagram   Youtube

Unsubscribe | Contact Us


This email was sent to stevenmagallanes520.nims@blogger.com using GovDelivery Communications Cloud on behalf of: U.S. Department of Defense
1400 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC 20301-1400

No comments:

Page List

Blog Archive

Search This Blog

Targeting 20–80% gains in days? This makes it possible

I've been tracking this pattern, and it's hard to ignore ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌ ...