I've been involved with hiring a lot of people over the years, interviewing job candidates and talking over their strengths and weaknesses with my colleagues. The most crucial and revealing part of this process is often the reference check. Whether I am recruiting a junior editor or a senior executive, hearing from people who have worked closely with candidates, who can speak to their working style, how they handle themselves under pressure, what they will bring — for good and for bad — to the workplace, is imperative. Most of us wouldn't hire a dog sitter without deeply vetting his work; why wouldn't we do the same for the office of president? So, for the latest project from the editorial board, we looked to the people who have worked most closely with Donald Trump to see what they had to say about the man who would like to hold, for a second time, the highest office in this country. We combed through the many books written about him, rewatched hours of interviews and testimony, and looked to the extraordinary reporting from our newsroom and others. What we assembled is, in effect, 91 letters of reference from 91 people speaking to their experiences with Trump. It runs the gamut from those who knew him before he went into politics — his family, colleagues from Trump Inc., people who worked with him on "The Apprentice" — to esteemed Republican politicians, people he personally hired during his tenure in the White House and heads of state who dealt with him on matters of global security. We hope you pay close attention to what they have said. Our conclusion? This is not a candidate who should make it past the reference check. Here's what we're focusing on today:
We hope you've enjoyed this newsletter, which is made possible through subscriber support. Subscribe to The New York Times. Games Here are today's Mini Crossword, Wordle and Spelling Bee. If you're in the mood to play more, find all our games here. Forward this newsletter to friends to share ideas and perspectives that will help inform their lives. They can sign up here. Do you have feedback? Email us at opiniontoday@nytimes.com. If you have questions about your Times account, delivery problems or other issues, visit our Help Page or contact The Times.
|
Thursday, September 26, 2024
Opinion Today: Let’s check Trump’s references
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Page List
Blog Archive
- September 2024 (2562)
- August 2024 (3156)
- July 2024 (3241)
- June 2024 (3107)
- May 2024 (3196)
- April 2024 (3104)
- March 2024 (3192)
- February 2024 (3006)
- January 2024 (3261)
- December 2023 (3176)
- November 2023 (3188)
- October 2023 (3191)
- September 2023 (2961)
- August 2023 (3120)
- July 2023 (3024)
- June 2023 (3042)
- May 2023 (3205)
- April 2023 (3030)
- March 2023 (2986)
- February 2023 (2584)
- January 2023 (2694)
- December 2022 (2745)
- November 2022 (2899)
- October 2022 (2916)
- September 2022 (2970)
- August 2022 (2981)
- July 2022 (2814)
- June 2022 (2759)
- May 2022 (2768)
- April 2022 (2692)
- March 2022 (2851)
- February 2022 (2550)
- January 2022 (2715)
- December 2021 (2641)
- November 2021 (2745)
- October 2021 (2836)
- September 2021 (2847)
- August 2021 (2756)
- July 2021 (2572)
- June 2021 (2738)
- May 2021 (2579)
- April 2021 (2698)
- March 2021 (2789)
- February 2021 (2532)
- January 2021 (2617)
- December 2020 (2664)
- November 2020 (2637)
- October 2020 (2824)
- September 2020 (2745)
- August 2020 (2704)
- July 2020 (2749)
- June 2020 (2669)
- May 2020 (2199)
- April 2020 (4060)
- March 2020 (5898)
- February 2020 (6963)
- January 2020 (7455)
- December 2019 (10)
Search This Blog
Quiz: Can you place 8 events in chronological order?
Play this week's quiz. View in browser | nytimes.com September 28, 2024 Can you place eight historical events in chronological order? ...
-
View Images Library Photos and Pictures. Как сделать усилитель сигнала сотовой связи своими руками Усилитель 3G сигнала своими руками Антен...
-
Download Images Library Photos and Pictures. 3 Graduation Invitation Letter Sample Invitation Letter Sample Invitation Letter To Friend For...
No comments:
Post a Comment