Thursday, July 6, 2023

Opinion Today: Is money from your utility bill slowing the clean energy transition?

States are finally starting to go after gas and electric companies that make customers pay for their lobbying costs.
Author Headshot

By Eliza Barclay

Climate Editor, Opinion

If you've ever felt a little suspicious of some of the fees on your electric or gas bill, your instinct may have been right: Your utility company probably didn't tell you that it can spend the money it collects from you on lobbying, public relations spending and dues to political groups that represent the industry.

But, as David Pomerantz of the Energy and Policy Institute wrote this week in a guest essay, this is a common practice.

And the lobbying is especially pernicious when the companies use the political system to extend the life of fossil fuel-powered plants and try to make it harder for customers to install rooftop solar. Utility companies, Pomerantz writes, "will support a clean energy transition only if it happens exclusively on their terms and at their pace — a stance at odds with the scope and urgency of the herculean task of decarbonizing our electric grid."

Pomerantz says the good news is that three states — Colorado, Connecticut and Maine — have passed laws forbidding utilities to use ratepayers' money to cover lobbying costs. Others should follow, he writes. More transparency and fines for utilities that charge customers for their political activities will go a long way to discourage this kind of counterproductive influence as the climate crisis grows worse, Pomerantz argues.

Here's what our readers are saying:

I consider it a primary responsibility of the power company to lobby for lower costs on behalf of its customers. Energy should be cheap and plentiful; it's what drives the economy and quite literally fuels our standard of living, which is the envy of most of the rest of the world. — Christopher, Columbus, Ohio

ADVERTISEMENT

Ad

I like to think about how solar will affect renters like me. As more families make the switch to solar to benefit us all, the renters of that area will be left out (why would a landlord upgrade to solar?). Our utility bills increase and we will bear the burden of paying more for our energy to prop up shareholder benefits. As a renter moving every two years I will have few of the benefits of solar. The P.U.C. and corporatized energy companies are a drain on the system that was created largely by using taxpayer money. The energy companies need to be seized by the state. — Jay, San Diego

Any rational and informed leadership of the nation would declare a national climate emergency, and then immediately nationalize the utilities as well as the oil and gas companies. Profit motive has to be taken out of the calculus as we figure out how many of us are going to survive the future. — WR_of_NJ, N.J.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ad

Here's what we're focusing on today:

More From Opinion

CHARLES M. BLOW

The Supreme Court Didn't Put Racism on a Leash. It Granted It License.

By striking down affirmative action, justices take the absurd position that racism must be ignored for racism to be overcome.

By Charles M. Blow

Article Image

PAMELA PAUL

What's the Story With Colleen Hoover?

Her wildly popular romance novels offer a fantasy that feels attainable: self-actualization.

By Pamela Paul

Article Image

GUEST ESSAY

A.I. Will Change Medicine but Not What It Means to Be a Doctor

How A.I. may change health care.

By Daniela J. Lamas

Article Image

GUEST ESSAY

The Little-Known Provision That Could Revolutionize Highway Travel

Buried in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act is a possible way to address all the costs associated with Americans' love of driving.

By Clifford Winston

Article Image

America, Shall I Compare Thee to a Chevy Volt?

Move over, apple pie. We're picking new American symbols.

By Michelle Cottle, Ross Douthat, Carlos Lozada and Lydia Polgreen

Article Image

JESSICA GROSE

Pro-Vaccine Views Are Winning. Don't Fear the Skeptics.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is getting a lot of play, but his views are in the minority.

By Jessica Grose

Article Image

LETTERS

Transgender Athletes in Women's Sports

Readers respond to a column by David French. Also: Banning nuclear weapons; premature book reviews; walking in the city.

Article Image

ADVERTISEMENT

Ad

Subscribe Today

New York Times Opinion curates a wide range of views, inviting rich discussion and debate that help readers analyze the world. This work is made possible with the support of subscribers. Please consider subscribing to The Times with this special offer.

Games Here are today's Mini Crossword, Wordle and Spelling Bee. If you're in the mood to play more, find all our games here.

Forward this newsletter to friends to share ideas and perspectives that will help inform their lives. They can sign up here. Do you have feedback? Email us at opiniontoday@nytimes.com.

If you have questions about your Times account, delivery problems or other issues, visit our Help Page or contact The Times.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for the Opinion Today newsletter from The New York Times.

To stop receiving Opinion Today, unsubscribe. To opt out of other promotional emails from The Times, including those regarding The Athletic, manage your email settings. To opt out of updates and offers sent from The Athletic, submit a request.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

No comments:

Page List

Blog Archive

Search This Blog

USAO - Massachusetts News Update

Offices of the United States Attorneys   You are subscribed to USAO - Massachusett...